Number Crunching


Prior to the 2005 MLB season, Baseball Prospectus had the following to say about Zack Greinke, a 21-year-old starting pitcher for the Kansas City Royals:

With apologies to Jon Landau, we have seen the future of pitching, and his name is Zack Greinke. There are two sets of opinions on Greinke. There’s the camp that thinks all the talk about him being the most unique young pitcher of our generation is overblown hype. Then there’s the camp of people who have seen him pitch.

Greinke, they would go on to say, possessed not only an All-Star caliber arsenal, but also a crafty pitching style which was perhaps unique in the game, especially among pitchers his age and with his ability.  Though he could throw a mid-90s fastball, he preferred to sit in the upper 80s, sacrificing speed for impeccable control.  He was prone to quick-pitch batters to catch them off-guard, teasing them with a slider or cutter before making them look foolish with a big sweeping curveball that dipped into Tim Wakefield territory.

That spring, the Royals decided that they could squeeze considerably better results out of Greinke — he’d posted a 1.17 WHIP his rookie year, but struck out “only” 6.21 batters per nine innings — if they tinkered with him a little bit.  And so they did, encouraging him to throw the ball harder and eschew some of his former style.  His WHIP ballooned to 1.56, thanks to a walk rate that was nearly twice what it had been in his rookie season.

Zack GreinkeJust 22 years old, Greinke appeared broken.  That winter, he was diagnosed with a “personal mental health condition.”  The Royals placed him on the 60-day DL and he essentially disappeared for the 2006 season, returning later in the year to make starts in AAA after undergoing treatment for what would eventually be revealed as Social Anxiety Disorder.

Greinke would essentially reemerge as a starter at the beginning of the 2007.  He was throwing harder, and from a statistical standpoint, matched the success of his rookie season.  In 2008, he was even better; still just 24,  his return had gone largely unnoticed by the national media.  That wouldn’t be the case for much longer: Greinke set the baseball world ablaze at the beginning of the 2009 season, and between the end of 2008 and beginning of 2009, he went 38 straight innings without allowing a run, capping the streak off with back-to-back complete game victories.  At 10-3 with a 1.95 ERA and 114 Ks in 115 innings, he’s the early favorite for the AL Cy Young Award.

What, if anything, does this all mean?

Greinke’s condition — Social Anxiety Disorder — is psychiatric condition that affects, by most estimates, approximately 5% of the adult population in America.  Usually brought on by situations of intense (real or imagined) social scrutiny, it’s characterized by excessive sweating, nausea, stammering, and in some cases severe panic attacks.  It can be specific (only brought on by certain situations) or generalized.  He was a highly-touted young prospect who came to the majors, encountered intense stress, and essentially wilted.  He disappeared from the game, underwent some form of treatment, and then reemerged the dominant force many imagined he’d become in the first place.

The problem here, of course, is that this all sounds very wishy-washy to the majority of those who care to watch and have an opinion on the matter.  During that difficult 2005 season, Greinke was paid about $330,000 to pitch relatively poorly for the Royals.  He was paid money — a lot of money, by most everybody’s standards — to play a game, a beautiful game, a cherished American game.  Wasn’t that good enough for him?  A normal person wouldn’t be given reprieve by their boss for feeling anxiety — why should this guy, rich as he was, and playing a sport where we expect men to be men, be afforded such a fairy-pants luxury?

The criticism was, and still is, very easy: grow up, you big baby, and deal with your failures, just like the rest of us normal folk do.  If you can’t take the pressure, you don’t belong; go push papers back in Orlando.

Then, there are the results.

Zack Greinke, snowflake that he was, is embarrassing your favorite hitters right now, and at 10-3 might be the best pitcher in the American League.  He was featured — knock on wood — on the cover of Sports Illustrated earlier this year, and hasn’t skipped a beat, even with the national spotlight now officially on him.  So can you really say that whatever happened, whatever he took time away from baseball to do, whatever he’s currently doing to help himself cope with the pressure, is all some big scam?  Some fraud perpetrated by the oversensitive clinical zeitgeist that’s wrapped the country in its big pink Snuggie?  Or, heaven forbid, was Zach Greinke cured?

Though he’s something of an afterthought in the minds of most baseball fans, many will recall that in the first half of the decade, Khalil Greene was considered a very good prospect.  The Clemson product was drafted by the Cubs in the 14th round of the 2001 draft, but elected to return to school to complete his senior year.  The decision certainly worked out: he posted a crazy 470/.552/.877  line in 2002, offensive stats which accompanied by his excellent defense at shortstop earned him USA Baseball’s Golden Spikes Award and a first-round selection by the San Diego Padres, who gave him a $1.5 million signing bonus.  He finished out 2002 playing for A+ Lake Elsinore, posting an .893 OPS alongside then-teammate Xavier Nady.

Greene was a September callup in 2003; the Padres, lacking a better option at short, opened 2004 with Greene as their starting shortstop (incumbent veteran Ramon Vazquez was sent to the bench).  Batting 8th in a lineup that included Sean Burroughs, Phil Nevin, and Ryan Klesko, Greene had a solid rookie season and managed a .795 OPS in 139 games.  His defense was not spectacular (.965 FPct was fifth-worst in the majors) but he stood out in his rookie class, taking home second honors in the Rookie of the Year voting behind former teammate Jason Bay.

Then his career basically stalled.  His 2004 season started a four-year period during which Greene batted a pedestrianKhalil Greene .256 with a .313 OBP while averaging just 497 plate apperances per season thanks to many handfuls of minor injuries. He did showcase decent power, especially on the road: he hit 15 homers in each of his 2004, 2005, and 2006 seasons, two-thirds of those homers coming away from Petco’s power-stifling confines.  In 2007, Greene finally logged 600+ appearances at the plate, popping 27 homers to go along with his a tepid .254 average. Almost half of his 2007 home runs (44%) came at Petco.

There were some underlying signs of a gradual change in approach.  While he spent those years battling cold stretches by tinkering with his stance, his selectivity at the plate waned: the percentage of balls outside the zone that he swung at increased with each passing year.  Of those bad pitches, he made contact with about half.  There are two types of hitters who can sustain success while swinging at high percentages of bad pitches: those who make up for it with tons of power (like Alfonso Soriano), or those who are just exceptionally good at hitting bad pitches (like Juan Pierre).  Greene, despite his modest HR totals, was neither of those things.

In 2008, the bottom fell out.  After parlaying those 27 homers into a 2-year $11m deal with the Padres, his average plummeted to .213 while his HR rate dropped over 40% from 2007.  Greene’s discipline at the plate suffered further, and he struck out five times as often as he walked.

July 30th of that season would be his final game in a Padres uniform.  Playing shortstop and batting 8th against the Diamondbacks, Greene grounded out twice to the left side of the infield – one going as a double play – and then struck out swinging against Dan Haren in the 7th, his 100th K of the year.  Following that at-bat, he returned to the clubhouse and punched an equipment storage container, fracturing his hand in the process.  He was replaced in the game by Edgar Gonzalez; the Padres, trailing 5-3 at the time, would go on to lose 7-3.

An ugly back-and-forth between Greene and the Padres ensued; never one to be particularly comfortable in the spotlight, the shortstop was now involved in a public battle over his salary, which the team attempted to recover after Greene’s self-inflicted injury ended his season.  Already in salary-dumping mode, the Padres had all the more reason to move Greene; they traded him in December to St. Louis for bizarro rightie Mark Worrell.

At this point, Greene is by no means a newcomer to the game; after breaking into the bigs in 2003 at age 23, he’s logged almost 2,800 plate appearances between the Padres and the Cardinals.  His career line of .245/.302/.423 is unsightly, and has not earned him much sympathy in the month since this story has broken.  Where, many ask, was this anxiety when he was doing well?  The more obvious question to me is: why now?  It’s been a very up-and-down ride for Greene, with an emphasis on the down: random variance in production is to be expected, but he’s made frequent habit of plummeting below the mendoza line.  Could his slumps hold any clues to his breaking point?

There have been 18 points throughout Greene’s career at which his 10-game average has cratered below the .150 mark. Three of those “craters” were also associated with dips in his 20-game average below .150.  Though Greene, prone to these bouts of poor play, has been streaky throughout his entire career, these prolonged extreme dips in his production are a relatively new phenomenon.  He’d always bounced back to mediocre before; now, he’s really wallowing.

Two of these three dips — those occurring on 7/18/2008 and 5/27/2009 — seem to be closely tied to Greene’s apparently exceptional levels of anguish.  Two weeks after the 7/18/2008 crater was when Greene punched the storage locker.  The timing there did seem off: Greene had actually raised his average a bit prior to that game, and his 20-game strikeout rate (then 3.4 AB/K) was not too far below his career rate (4.6 AB/K).  Still, it was obviously out of frustration over his poor play that Greene lashed out, and it can be seen that he was playing exceptionally poorly at that time.

The second bout of problems, his being placed on the DL with an “anxiety disorder,” occurred around the 5/27/2009.  Not only was he playing some of the worst baseball of his career, he’d also been basically relegated to a utility role on LaRussa’s squad, and had been the subject of some trade rumors.  This was all too much for Greene, who actually tried to come back , went 5-25 with 3 HR, and then was returned to the DL with Social Anxiety Disorder.

What about his first foray into Batting Average Hell?  That occurred at the end of the 2006 season, when he missed time with a lingering finger sprain (he sprained it swinging a bat, then was hit in the hand by a Brandon Backe pitch when he attempted to return to the lineup after a few games off).  The sprain severely hampered his offensive output: the Cardinals were simply killing themselves with Greene in the lineup, as he went 1-23 with 10 strikeouts to finish the 2006 season.  We can give him the benefit of the doubt: this particular extended slump appears to have been related to the finger injury (he’s missed 155 games over his career due to injury, an amount which encompasses almost a full season’s worth of games;  actually, Greene has never played 155 games in any season).

Khalil GreeneIt’s somewhat absurd, of course, to pretend that still-mysterious mental disorders can be studied in any meaningful way by looking at such crude statistical measures.  This is what we have, though, and aside from a very loose correlation, we can’t make any meaningful armchair diagnoses.  So did Greene have these problems prior to arriving in St. Louis?  What, if anything, set him off?

It’s entirely possible that nothing really changed in Greene.  We don’t know if he approached the team, or the team approached him: it’s entirely plausible that someone on staff thought they saw something troubling in his demeanor and set the process rolling him- or herself.  The organization might be slightly more inclined to notice these things: Greene’s current teammate, Rick Ankiel, who famously imploded during the 2000 NLCS in front of a national television audience and whose setbacks were so severe that he had to abandon pitching altogether, has basically recovered from a far more public nightmare.

Complicating matters is the fact that we can’t really say for sure who Greene is as a player  – and neither can he.  He had an accomplished college career, but in truth, has never excelled at any professional level.  Is his poor hitting caused by anxiety, or is his anxiety caused by poor hitting?  Many have made careers of being slick-fielding offensive failures; does Greene’s embattled exterior mask the innards of a good-glove-no-stick infielder who’ll occasionally run into 10-20 homers per season?  It’s possible that he holds himself to higher standards than he’s destined to ever achieve, and that he’s basically been unable to cope with what he is.

This all sounds somewhat strange, this business of players having to understand things like value, much less comprehend and accept their own value.  Once upon a time, if a little rocket-armed right-hander couldn’t handle pitching games all year, he was a failure, a weakling, the stuff of boorish clubhouse jokes strung up on beer-stained breath.  Then someone came along and decided that maybe there should be such a thing as a relief pitcher, and that maybe some of these kids who couldn’t throw 200 innings could throw 80 and be really, really good at it.  Suddenly, the reliever was born, and from that radical thought, the closer.  Now, some of the most feared and respected pitchers in the game — Joe Nathan, Jonathan Papelbon, and the best relief pitcher in baseball history, Mariano Rivera — are in fact failed former starters.  Sixty years ago, Mariano Rivera is just a dumb fisherman who couldn’t hang with real men.  Now, he’s a legend.

Often, their shoulders simply couldn’t handle the load.  It’s easy to forget how absurd the notion of pitch counts once was; now, if you aren’t up on keeping your pitchers healthy, you’re seen as an idiot.  Some still disagree with the concept of protecting pitchers from excessive physical stress, but those stalwarts are very much dying off.  And it’s not just pitchers.  It used to be that injuries were seen as a sign of some nonspecific “weakness” in a person’s fortitude.  Now, the diligent prevention of them is big business.  Ignoring a physical injury isn’t a sign of strength, it’s a sign of stupidity, one that costs teams ballgames and millions of dollars (look at what some are whispering about the Yankees’ treatment of A-Rod’s injury).

Mental disorders are essentially uncharted territory.  If Cubs fans could go back in time and collectively give Mark Prior’s shoulder a hot, therapeutic massage with some garish pink vibrating implement, they absolutely would, pride and toughness be damned.  It is difficult to say exactly what the difference is between a physical issue, like a weak shoulder, and a mental issue, like a weak sense of self-worth.  We can test for the former, and while some say we can test for the latter, it still doesn’t feel right to us.  This might be because it’s already been so embraced — and almost certainly abused — in other areas.  Suddenly, common mental disorders like SAD and ADHD aren’t legitimate medical conditions, they’re excuses used by lazy parents to shield their coddled sons and daughters from the altogether normal pressures of childhood.  We see a ballplayer claiming to have the same problem, we make a connection; this guy is just making excuses.  It’s totally natural.  But is it right?

Football players are famously given Wonderlic tests during their young careers. Most would bluntly argue that the tests are designed to see if that big, hulking quarterback is smart or an idiot; mental deficiencies are cutely expected and dealt with in sports where men are often measured by the force with which they are able to hurl themselves about.  Really, they test intelligence, logic, and decision-making abilities, or they’re supposed to.  Even then, a poor Wonderlic score is not a sign that a person isn’t cut out to play football.Ian Snell

It’s not difficult to see a world where baseball teams start paying attention to this sort of thing, assessing both mental quickness and fortitude alongside their physical counterparts. While society can’t even really decide what a person’s mind “should” be like (because really, there’s no answer to that question), teams are already paying attention. They’re The “Disabled List” has been somewhat radically re-purposed to handle players dealing with stress- and anxiety-related issues; in addition to Greene, Dontrelle Willis, Joey Votto, and Ian Snell have all thusly missed time this year.

It will be a very long time before baseball considers a chronic personality issue in the same way they treat a chronic hamstring issue, but it’s reasonable to expect that it will happen.  Until then, it’s worth plenty of discussion.  We’ll never stop worshipping our favorite players, because god dammit, we want to.  That’s what makes all this steroid business so troubling: you’re making it too damned hard for us to love you.  And so we may as well ask ourselves what we really want from these guys.  We are willing to pay you all sorts of money so that we can sit around and watch you play baseball.  Most of us would like you to do this without taking anabolic steroids or HGH or any other dubious creams, ointments, pills, or injections.  Do we also expect stone-faced toughness at all costs in the face of adversity?  We no longer hiss and spit when shin splints disable our favorite lumbering first baseman.  Will there come a time when a monthlong stress-induced DL stint isn’t met with indignant scoffing?

Zach Greinke and the Royals may have done something relatively revolutionary, if we ever come to deciding that what they did was a model for success.  There will always be decisions to make.  We can’t keep paying for your surgeries if you can’t throw a strike to begin with, and maybe Khalil Greene is just not good enough to be paid $6.5 million to undergo counseling.  Baseball, at some level, will embrace this.  It’s about talented superstars and winning organizations.   If the next Tim Lincecum needs a little help understanding how to deal with his situation, why shouldn’t we as fans demand that our training staff gets right on that?

Albert Pujols homers off Brad Lidge

Albert Pujols homers off Brad Lidge

Many pencils have been snapped in half, and many cabana shirts ruffled, in the fret-mongering which has accompanied this so-called sabermetrics thing.  So, too, have certain statistics become haplessly passe, relegated to the same corners of Americana where rotary telephones and record players elicit warm memories but little actual use.

The RBI is one of those statistics.  By now, criticizing the Run Batted In is relatively cliched: it’s a comfortable realization, that RBIs are really a measure of a bunch of things that are totally out of control of the hitter.  He can’t account for whether or not the guys in front of him reached base.  He can only try to get a hit, and he will only be successful a small fraction of the time at that.  He’s not trying harder when there are guys on – or he shouldn’t be, at the very least.  A batter will get a hit of some sort based on some ethereal probability function, and if there happen to be other batters occupying bases, they stand a good chance of being knocked in.  That’s what RBI tend to measure: a batter, in a very indirect way, through the productivity of those around him.

Still, there are many who tend to think via a more bullheaded sort of logic: if you drive in your teammates, you are by definition being productive, so it’s perfectly reasonable that how many teammates you drive in is equal to how productive you are.  This isn’t entirely inaccurate, since good hitters will tend to knock in their teammates more often than bad hitters, but it misses the point.  A guy who gets a leadoff double is probably doing more than his teammate who comes along and singles him in, and to measure by individual runs and RBIs is to needlessly obfuscate this fact.

That said, it’s still interesting to look at who’s been knocking guys in, because yes, these players do tend to be among the best in the game.  What follows is a list of RBI shares, or the percentage of a team’s total Runs Batted In that a player is responsible for — and the players are, of course, all stars.  But the gradations and the rankings are not what you’d logically expect, and it’s interesting to postulate on why, exactly, they end up like they do here.     The simple answer is that there happen to be guys on base when they get hits.  The more complicated answers?  I don’t know.  Maybe they’re below.  Maybe they’re not. You tell me.

Numbers 1-5:

1. Albert Pujols, St. Louis (70 RBI, 22.01%): Was there ever any doubt in your mind?  There is little to write about Albert Pujols, who is the best hitter in the game and could finish his career as one of the best hitters of all time, that hasn’t already been said.  His status atop this list is not a testament to his prime spot in a productive lineup, it is a spot he himself has earned alone.  Pujols has 70 RBI, which is more than anyone else in baseball, and 32 more than Ryan Ludwick, the team’s second-best run producer.  His 26 homers, also the most in baseball, are 15 more than Ludwick has.  It’s almost unfair to the Cardinals to point out how much better Pujols is than everyone else in that lineup, because he’s better than anyone else in baseball period, but it’s true.  No matter who you think the Cardinals’ second-best hitter this year has been — Ludwick, Rasmus, Schumaker — he hasn’t really been all that good.  Pujols is positively scary, and he’s the reason that St. Louis is in first place in the NL Central right now. Even if you think you’re paying attention to him right now, pay more attention.  You will not see another like him.

2. Prince Fielder, Milwaukee (68 RBI, 20.36%): Prince Fielder might never again reach the 50-homer plateau, something he did as a big-league sophomore in 2007, but that doesn’t mean he’s getting worse as a player.  Still just 25 years old, Fielder is quietly having an excellent season in Milwaukee, batting .301 with 18 homers in 72 games for the Brewers.  The svelte 1B is posting a career-best walk rate of almost 17% and looks to be developing a more discerning eye at the plate.  Lefties gave him fits last year (.239), but he’s dramatically improved his splits against them.  He leads the Majors in Win Probability Added.  Fielder has made good on the productivity that has surrounded him all year – guys like Rickie Weeks, Corey Hart, and Ryan Braun.  Even Craig Counsell (taking over for Weeks) and Mike Cameron have been decent in their roles.  The Brewers bought out his ‘09 and ‘10 arbitration seasons for a combined total of $18 million, and they got a deal.

3. Jason Bay, Boston (69 RBI, 18.80%): Remember when Jason Bay was no sure thing to be able to handle Boston’s hectic environment?  Neither do opposing pitchers.  Bay’s timing is impeccable: he’s in line for a career year in 2009, which, in the middle of Boston’s lineup, allows him to rack up all sorts of nifty counting stats (his 69 RBI are second only to Pujols).  It’s all the more impressive that Bay didn’t miss a beat when David Ortiz spent most of the season’s first half hitting like Pokey Reese.  Bay assumed Top Dog status in Boston’s lineup without blinking, and it’s not the Fenway Effect: his OPS is 100 points higher on the road than it is at home.  He’s hitting righties, lefties, and is slugging .703 with runners in scoring position.  Ellsbury, Pedroia, Youk, and Lowell have all posted very strong seasons — time and time again, they’ve been on for Bay, and Bay has delivered, helping keep Boston in first place in the East.

Adrian Gonzalez

Adrian Gonzalez

e4. Adrian Gonzalez (47 RBI, 17.67%): Adrian Gonzalez is perhaps the most underrated and underappreciated offensive player in baseball.  His .275/.417/.599 line is impressive enough before you consider that it’s been protected by Chase Headley and Kevin Kouzmanoff, who while combined have hit 17 homers on the year, they are also batting just .236 and striking out in 25% of their at-bats.  Gonzalez is also posting just a .256 Batting Average on Balls in Play, though that may be partially deflated by the fact that 24 of his hits have never technically entered the field of play.  Those 24 homers are second to only Albert Pujols, and Gonzalez plays half his games at Petco, the Majors’ toughest park to hit homers in (16 road HR, 8 home HR).  David Eckstein, who hits before him, has a .329 OBP, and that’s not even the worst they did to AG.  Through the end of May, the Padres inexplicably led off with either Brian Giles or Jody Gerut, neither of whom could manage to get on base at even a .300 clip.  They’ve plugged Tony Gwynn Junior into the leadoff hole in June, and he’s responded by posting a .420 OBP; getting some runners on base in front of Gonzalez will help recover at least some small amount of his incredible value, which is mostly wasted on this woeful ballclub.  He has the fewest RBI (47) on this list, but it’s not for lack of trying; he is simply not deriving any value from his spot in the lineup.  Oh, and he’s making just $3 million this year.  Think the Marlins — who traded him away as a minor leaguer in ‘03 for Ugueth Urbina — would like a do-over?

5. Mark Reynolds (53 RBI, 17.49%): Mark Reynolds strikes out a lot.  A whole lot.  In 2008, he became the only player in Major League history to strike out 200 times in a season.  Think about that.  He’s the only person to have ever done that in history.  He’s locking horns with Chris Davis (TEX) for the rights to break that record again this year.  It’s as much a part of his identity as is the fact that he is from Kentucky and plays the field with shoes made of bricks.  So severe are the shortcomings in his game that he would probably not even be in the Majors were it not for the fact that he is also preternaturally inclined to hit ludicrous, prodigious home runs when he squares up the baseball.  Reynolds average Standard Distance for his home runs (or the distance the ball would travel from plate to ground in a neutral environment) is 415 feet, tying him with Ryan Howard for 8th-farthest in the Majors.  His 21 homers are matched by a .269 batting average, which for Reynolds is almost comically high and will certainly not persist.  Only the aforementioned Chris Davis swings and misses more often than him, and Davis is batting .209 with just 6 fewer homers.  He’s hitting just .247 with RISP and 9 of his homers have come with the bases empty, so his production has simply been extremely consistent.

Numbers 6-10:

6. Justin Morneau (58 RBI, 17.37%)
7. Brandon Phillips (48 RBI, 16.78%)
8. Adam Dunn (50 RBI, 16.61%)
9. Raul Ibanez (59 RBI, 16.53%)
10. Torii Hunter (54 RBI, 16.36%)
11. Ryan Howard (57 RBI, 15.97%)
12. Jose Lopez (42 RBI, 15.73%)
13. Bengie Molina (41 RBI, 15.65%)
14. Carlos Lee (43 RBI, 15.47%)
15. Paul Konerko (46 RBI, 15.38%)
16. Evan Longoria (61 RBI, 15.29%)
17. Ryan Braun (51 RBI, 15.27%)
18. Mark Teixeira (57 RBI, 15.16%)
19. Lance Berkman (42 RBI, 15.11%)
20. Aubrey Huff (47 RBI, 15.06%)
21. Victor Martinez (54 RBI, 15.04%)

6. Justin Morneau (58 RBI, 17.37%): Your 2006 AL MVP would be joined on this list by the slick-hitting Joe Mauer (.395/.465/.697) but for Mauer’s lack of April plate appearances.  Morneau and Mauer have been a prodigious pair at the heart of the Minnesota lineup, which has been quietly productive, rounded out by strong years from Michael Cuddyer and Denard Span, who has taken over leadoff duties for the Twins and posted a .388 OBP.

7. Brandon Phillips (48 RBI, 16.78%): After years of striking out twice as much as he walked, Phillips, the game’s model late bloomer, has finally begun to reverse the trend.  His K/BB is an even 1.00 in 2009; Cincinatti’s offense is not very good, but Phillips’ approach has allowed him to be successful in spite of the unimpressive cogs surrounding him as of late.

8. Adam Dunn (50 RBI, 16.61%):  Adam Dunn waited a very long time to get a deal this past offseason, and he finally went where the biggest dollop of cash was: $20 million for two years in a Washington Natinals uniform.  The pitching’s been much more embarrassing; Dunn at least has Ryan Zimmerman down there, and Nick Johnson has quietly been quite good in the time he’s played.  A sixth straight 40+ HR season is very much in reach, especially if he starts hitting at home (.774 OPS).

9. Raul Ibanez (59 RBI, 16.53%):  He has either been talked about too much or too little this year; the Phillies were roundly criticized for jumping the gun and giving the aging Ibanez a three-year deal, but they smelled blood in the water.  For $6.5m in 2009, he’s been a revelation in that lineup, helping pace the Phils as they try to get back to the World Series.  He hasn’t even been in a typical “prime” RBI spot, spending most of his time at #6 while Ryan Howard (#11 on this list) bats cleanup.

Torii Hunter: Production Nothing New

Torii Hunter: Production Nothing New

10. Torii Hunter (54 RBI, 16.36%):  Torii Hunter has spent most of the first half hitting cleanup for the Angels in Vlad’s absence, and did not disappoint.  The 13-year veteran posted a .915 OPS as the #4 batter, and has shifted to #3 now that Vlad is returned.  He’ll continue to produce with the bat — and the glove — the way he always has, and perhaps always will.

Numbers 11-20:

11. Ryan Howard (57 RBI, 15.97%)

12. Jose Lopez (42 RBI, 15.73%)

13. Bengie Molina (41 RBI, 15.65%)

14. Carlos Lee (43 RBI, 15.47%)

15. Paul Konerko (46 RBI, 15.38%)

16. Evan Longoria (61 RBI, 15.29%)

17. Ryan Braun (51 RBI, 15.27%)

18. Mark Teixeira (57 RBI, 15.16%)

19. Lance Berkman (42 RBI, 15.11%)

20. Aubrey Huff (47 RBI, 15.06%)

After parting ways with closer Bob Wickman during the 2006 season, the Cleveland Indians, in the midst of a season in which their +88 run differential resulted in only a disappointing 78-84 fourth place finish, needed a new closer. At this point, the Indians had established a recent history of getting saves from wherever they could.  Although Bob Wickman had been The Man in Cleveland for most of the last few years, and notched an impressive 45 saves in 2005, the Indians got four or more saves from four different pitchers in 2004, and no more than 25 from a single reliever in 2002 or 2003.

As such, the last couple months of 2006 served as something of a tryout period.  The Indians, in a division where three teams ahead of them would go on to win 90 or more games, weren’t playing for anything, and one of their goals in August and September was to find someone who could fill the large hole that Wickman had left at the back of the bullpen.  The results were disastrous.

Wickman pitched his last game for Cleveland on July 19 before heading to Atlanta. It was July 30 before the Indians played a game in which a situation arose where their new closer ought to be used; it was 3-3 heading into the ninth inning against the Mariners, and Eric Wedge called on Fausto Carmona to pitch the top of the inning.  Three hits, two walks, and four runs later, the Mariners were up 7-3 and on their way to a victory.  Still, the appearance wasn’t even a genuine save opportunity, so Carmona was called upon the following night in Boston, when the Indians took an 8-6 lead into the bottom of the ninth.  With one out and two on, David Ortiz launched a shot into the Fenway stands that ended the game with a 9-8 Boston win, and also launched an unbelievable run of 9th-inning ineptitude for Carmona.  His next two appearances came in one-run save opportunites, which he turned into walkoff victories for Boston (again) and Detroit, respectively.

All told, Carmona’s four-game run of ‘closer opportunties’ resulted in this line:

0-4, 2.2 IP, 8 H, 11 ER, 4 BB, 4 K, 2 HR, 37.13 ERA, 1.682 OOPS

Is it any wonder that those of us who had him on our fantasy teams during this stretch were initially a little skeptical at his success in the starting rotation a year later?

While the rest of the Indians’ experiments at closer that season weren’t as epicly bad as Carmona was, they certainly didn’t find anyone they had any confidence in heading into 2007.  After eight impressive innings from C.C. Sabathia on August 18, Brian Sikorski and Jason Davis combined to blow a 5-3 lead to Tampa Bay, resulting in yet another walkoff loss.  Tom Mastny briefly looked like he might be the solution, recording saves in five straight chances between August 19 and September 2. His last two save opportunties of the season, however, resulted in a walkoff win for the White Sox and then a blown save vs. the Twins.

Clearly, a solution was needed.  The Indians, despite their tough division and their disappointing 2006 win-loss record, were poised to be a dangerous team in 2007.  And, in fact, much of that unsatisfactory 2006 record could be attributed to the their bullpen, which compiled a 4.73 ERA, including an unsightly 5.62 ERA in save situations.

That solution, as it turns out, was Joe Borowski.  Signed for a one year, $4.5 million deal in December 2006, Borowski was coming off a solid, if not spectacular, season for Florida: 33 saves with a 3.75 ERA.  No one in Cleveland thought he was among the league’s elite firemen, but surely he’d fare better than the rookies and journeymen that the Indians were throwing out there in the ninth for the last half of 2006, right?

Well…. the answer to that question is debatable.  Borowski ended up blowing eight saves.  But he also racked up 45 of them.  But he did so while putting up a 5.07 ERA.  The most important thing he did in 2007 was managing to keep the closer’s job from the first day in April until the Indians were eliminated from the playoffs in October.  The fact that Borowski was able to maintain the job and put up as many saves as he did with such ugly peripherals (a 1.43 WHIP to go with that 5.07 ERA), resulted in his being immortalized, following the season, in two separate ways:

1. Fantasy baseball pundits, in arguing that saves were saves, no matter what ERA and WHIP figures were attached to them, were able to point to Borowski as the quintessential example of this.  No need to trot Todd Jones’s name out there anymore!

2. It led to a friend and I coining “The Borowski Rule,” which applied Eric Wedge’s school of bullpen managing to relationships.  The abridged theory: If a romantic interest was in a relationship with a Joe Borowski-caliber boyfriend, it wasn’t enough to be a Rafael Betancourt-caliber setup man (while Borowski was making Indians’ fans’ hearts race in ninth innings in 2007, Betancourt was posting an outlandish 1.47 ERA and 0.76 WHIP as the eighth inning guy). You had to hope that a few mistakes were made and saves were blown along the way, and even then, who knows how much loyalty that girl has to “Borowski.”

Of course, early in 2008, both of these arguments fell apart: Borowski’s injury-riddled season resulted in even worse numbers than 2007’s: a 7.56 ERA and 1.92 WHIP in 16.2 IP.  The injuries didn’t fit into the analogy of The Borowski Rule, and what Betancourt did when he was given a shot at the closer’s gig was unsettling for the theory, to say the least.  Meanwhile, even when he was able to pitch, Borowski was supplanted from the ninth inning, ruining that theory that fantasy experts were spouting.

And still the Indians couldn’t find their closer.  As mentioned, when Betancourt finally got his shot, he didn’t exactly live up to the expectations he’d established following his 2007 season; his first ten appearances after Borowski went on the DL resulted in the following line:

0-2, 8.2 IP, 10 H, 8 ER, 2 BB, 7 K, 8.31 ERA

Although he only blew one save opportunity, while converting four, and his WHIP suggested that he’d been a bit unlucky, his trial period was over.  Wedge was still managing, and his trigger finger had gotten a little quicker following the Carmona incident in 2006.  This led to a revolving door of closer candidates getting their shot in Cleveland this year.  Masa Kobayashi held the role briefly; Borowski got another shot when he was briefly healthy; Rafael Perez got a chance or two, but the team clearly feels that his left arm and ability to go multiple innings are more valuable in middle relief.

Which brings us to Jensen Lewis.

Jensen Lewis is not an elite major league pitcher.  He’s still young, having just turned 24 earlier this season, and as a third round pick in 2005, he has worked his way to the majors quickly.  It’s entirely possible that he could still develop into something like an elite major league pitcher.  But he’s just not there yet.  As recently as June of this year, he was in Buffalo, Cleveland’s AAA affiliate, sorting out issues with his velocity and control.  His stats this year are mediocre; a 4.05 ERA, 1.46 WHIP, and 41:22 K/BB ratio aren’t exactly what you want to see from your closer.

But this is Cleveland.  The Cleveland that made it to within one game of the World Series last year with Joe Borowski.  The Cleveland whose save leaders by season since 2000 have been Steve Karsay, Danys Baez, and Bob Wickman.  So when Lewis converts his first seven save opportunites this year, putting him, by the way, in the team lead for 2008 saves, fans get excited.  Thoughts of Tom Mastny fade away.  Eric Wedge starts suggesting that Lewis “looks outstanding” and is showing “a lot of moxie.”

For a franchise that has, perhaps astutely so, never shelled out big bucks for a top-notch bullpen arm, is there any doubt that, barring a September collapse, Lewis will begin the 2009 season as the closer?  Whether he’s The Man for the future remains to be seen, but right now he looks like Mariano Rivera to Indians fans, so they’re just enjoying it while it lasts.

Chase Utley is the best second baseman on the planet.  There are, dotting the rosters of major league clubs throughout the country, a number of very good ones.  Mark Ellis is a defensive whiz.  Dustin Pedroia is a sparkplug.  Brian Roberts is speedy, Brandon Phillips is toolsy.  Dan Uggla is strong.  Ian Kinsler is dynamic.  They’re not as good as Chase, though, and they know it.  Utley is a top-five defensive 2B (RZR: .837, FP: .984), and has become the premier offensive 2B of our time: his 127 OPS+ is highest among active 2B with at least 3,000 plate appearances (Chase himself doesn’t actually qualify for that list, but he likely will by the end of the season).  Plus, he’s “only” 29.  It’s ridiculously early to begin considering these things, but if he stays healthy, he could one day have a Hall of Fame case a la the incredible Jeff Kent, from whom Chase is grabbing the top 2B reigns.

2008, though, has been something of a forgotten year for him.  How much buzz have you really been hearing about the guy?  After jumping into the spotlight with a .309/.379/.540 line in 2006, Utley got better across the board in 2007, going .332/.410/.566 while earning MVP consideration (he finished 8th, but a lot of Rollins voters could easily have gone with him instead).  He’s currently at .281/.365/.554 and has slid backwards everywhere but the power category, thanks to what would appear to be an increased number of pulled “line drive” home runs: only three of his homers have been left of the second base bag, and the average apex height of his homers is 90.4 feet above field level this year, compared to 110.4 in 2007 (and an average of 100 for teammate Ryan Howard this year).  Utley’s Isolated Power figure of .266 (weighting doubles and triples equally) is a career-best and just behind Uggla’s .268 figure among all second basemen.  No one else is even over .200.

While Utley’s power numbers have increased, his power probably hasn’t actually increased in any way this year.  His doubles have actually dipped a little bit (48 in 2007, currently at 33), so his slugging has basically stayed the same.  His 45-point drop in on-base percentage is due mostly to a significant decline in batting average, as his BB and HBP rates are just about the same.  He’s also posting the same strikeout rate (16.7%) as he did in 2007, which would indicate that his low batting average is a little unlucky.  This would appear to have some truth to it: his contact rate is the exact same this year as last (84.82%), but his BABIP has fallen an incredible 85 points over that timespan, from .368 to .283.  From 2005-2007, Utley posted a .340 BABIP, so he’s certainly better than his .283 average has shown, and with a 22.6% line drive rate, definitely deserves a higher season average.

Still, it’s practically impossible for Utley to be considered for the MVP with that ugly .283 mark (right?), which is why it was slightly surprising that his face was one of three (alongside Pujols and Sabathia) to appear on ESPN’s MLB front page pointing to a Rob Neyer-led MVP debate.  No NL player has won the MVP and had an average that low since Dale Murphy hit .281 in 1982 to lead the Braves to the NLCS.  In prefacing his recent ESPN chat, Neyer had this to say about Utley’s chances at the award:

If Utley hadn’t spent a [month] on the DL last year, he might well have aced teammate Jimmy Rollins for MVP honors. This year Utley’s missed only two games, and is probably going to shatter his personal bests in both home runs and RBI. If the Phillies beat the Mets again this year, Utley’s going to get more credit than anybody else.

At 30 home runs, Utley will probably surpass his career high of 32, set in 2006.  “Shattering” his personal best in RBI, though, is another matter entirely: currently sitting on 83, Utley is 22 back of his career best of 105 RBI in 2005.  At his current pace, he’ll need about 125 at-bats to match that total, or 3.39 AB/game for the rest of the Phillies’ regular season.  Chase is about as tough as they come, but with a reportedly balky hip, those at-bats are not guaranteed (though in the middle of a pennant race, the hip would have to be broken for him to take himself out of a game.)

Predicting RBI remains too complex a task to reliably do, but it’s worth noting that Utley’s production in that department has steadily declined as 2008 has gone on.  After driving in 47 runs between April and May, he knocked in 16 in June, 10 in July, and is sitting on 8 in August.  His current six game RBI-less streak matches his longest of the season; meanwhile, the Phillies averaged just under three runs per game over that stretch, going 3-3.

The Phillies currently sit a game and a half behind the Mets, and Neyer is right: he’s their most important player, and has a massive 1.072 OPS in Phillies wins compared to a .724 figure in Phillies losses.  That BABIP could actually end up working in his favor: if his strikeouts don’t increase, Utley stands a good chance of running into some better fortunes in September, where a high-profile pennant race could thrust him (and his theoretical mashing) into the spotlight.  He was a popular “should’ve been” pick for last year’s NL MVP, which could also work in his favor (voters will be well acquainted with him).  Plus, most of his offensive competition should be sitting at home this October (Albert Pujols is the best hitter in the NL, and it’s not close).

For the sake of argument, let’s pretend that the pendulum swings the other way starting tonight, and Utley gets extremely hot.  We’ll set “extremely hot” equal to his performance level this past April, where he batted .352 and cranked 10 homers in 108 at-bats.  We’ll also give him that 125 at-bats we talked about earlier.  What do Chase Utley’s final 2008 numbers look like in that scenario?

594 AB, 42 HR, 108 R, 107 RBI, .298 AVG, .590 SLG.

That’d be an incredible HR total, but his R/RBI numbers wouldn’t be all that crazy in terms of his career output.  The batting average would still be relatively low for an MVP candidate, but he would essentially be a .300 hitter with 40+ home runs as a second baseman.  His 42 home runs would actually tie Rogers Hornsby (1922) and Davey Johnson (1973) for the most ever hit by a 2B in a single season, and while he couldn’t match Hornsby’s .401 batting average if he was hitting off a tee for the rest of the season, he’d best Johnson’s .270, making it one of the greatest offensive seasons by a second baseman in the history of the game.  For reference, Johnson had 6 homers that August, and Hornsby… well, he played in 1922.  It’s a very unlikely accomplishment.

Still, should Utley reach something close to those totals, combined with his post-2007 MVP hype and a theoretical NL East pennant, he would unquestionably be a real contender for the award.  Much breath has been exhausted ridiculing the fact that MVP voters tend to favor players whose teams reach the postseason, so it’s really not necessary to get into it here, but the fact is that it would be a knock against guys like Pujols, who in 8 seasons has finished outside the top 4 in MVP voting only once (2007) but still has just one of the trophies in his case.

Middle infielders with penchants for dirty uniform pants naturally find it quite difficult to be hyper-productive in August: it’s hot, and they’re tired.  As such, it’s unlikely that Utley’s aforementioned season will be realized, but something like .287/35/100 is very reachable.  They’re just not really MVP-type numbers, so he’d need a significant qualitative boost from the voters if he were to make serious noise in that regard.  There will be plenty of guys in the NL who top those marks – a lot of them will just be OF/1B types (Chipper Jones, Matt Holliday, Lance Berkman) who play on bad baseball teams.  There are also, as Neyer suggests, pitchers to consider, like Brandon Webb and Tim Lincecum (okay, Lincecum is a bit outrageous, but he probably should be considered for every desirable award and honor in the country on principle alone).

Though he hasn’t gotten much attention this year (he led all NL players in All-Star voting, but only hit 5 homers in the HR Derby and went 1-3 early in a long All-Star game), he’s had a very good season and has a small chance at a fantastic one. He’s an outside MVP candidate at best right now, but MVP races generally last through September, so voters’ minds remain plenty malleable.  After being swept by the Rockies in a devastating letdown NLDS last year, Chase would undoubtedly trade his chance at the hardward for another shot at a World Series title.  In a highly-competitive division, though, if the Phillies are going to be contenders for that honor, he’s going to have to play like an MVP anyways.

When teams suffer a (relatively) quick slew of hope-dashing defeats, the air about the club can turn overwhelmingly and almost irreparably negative. Losses become “expected,” while wins become “lucky,” even from season to season. Optimism is eschewed for compulsory bitterness. This is a very curious but altogether commonplace phenomenon. It’s really just a human coping mechanism. If we never hope for anything, see, our hopes can never be crushed.

To me, Mets fans kind of typify this behavior. The Mets lost a heartbreaking NLCS – on a goddamned curveball, no less – in 2006 and then were embarrassingly ushered out of the playoff hunt in 2007. It was no surprise, then, that when the team stumbled out of the gate in 2008, Mets fans were calling for the head of Willie Randolph and damn near wondering if Shea Stadium should be burned to the ground so that a virgin franchise could be created anew in its place.

Okay, maybe that’s a little dramatic. But fast-forward to August, and while the organization has replaced Randolph with O.G. Jerry Manuel and currently sits just 2 games behind the first-place Phillies, Mets fans are still an extraordinarily fatalistic bunch. They’re not really sure that they like this team, not really sure that they can count on these guys to make them proud. Much of their Queensian vitriol has been spewed at the bullpen, and has been for years. This year – at least amongst my friends who are Mets fans – the hatred has been piled most notably upon one man: Aaron Michael Heilman. All the Mets fans I know totally hate this guy. All he does is blow games. He is the grim reaper in a baseball cap.

Naturally, I got curious. Why, in his age 29 season, has he become the face of ineptitude?

A lifelong Metropolitan, Heilman’s in his sixth season with the big club, and holds a 21-32 record in 290 games (25 starts) with 8 converted saves and 14 blown saves. Blown saves (and wins and losses, to that end) aren’t necessarily the most impartial way to judge a reliever’s success, of course, but the number certainly doesn’t look too good. Nor does the record itself, but such is relief work: you can’t win a game by yourself, but you can damn sure lose one.

He was born on November 12th, 1978 in Logansport, Indiana, a small town of about 20,000 people that sits at the junction of the Wabash and Northern Eel Rivers. Samuel P. Bush – great-grandfather of the esteemed U.S. President – cut his teeth there as a railroad mechanic, and Major League Baseball’s first commissioner, Kensaw Mountain Landis, also hailed from Logansport. Heilman attended the local high school and then went on to pitch for Notre Dame, where he compiled a 43-7 record with a 2.50 ERA in 4 years, including a 15-0 mark in his senior year. Only 14 other Division I collegians have ever won 40 or more games in their career.

Those impressive credentials got the 6′5″ 225lb Heilman picked by the Mets in the first round (18th overall) of the 2001 amateur draft (he’d also been picked in the first round in 2000 – by the Twins – but elected to return for his senior year). He spent only one full year in the minors before making his major league debut in June of 2003, getting a home start against the Marlins in which he was saddled with the loss (thanks to a couple Mets errors, including one by Heilman himself) despite surrendering just 1 earned run in 6 innings. The Mets didn’t finish very well that year (66-95) and neither did Heilman, who finished 2-7 with a 6.75 ERA in 13 starts. He bounced between AAA and the majors in 2004, and the organization began to sour on him as a starter thanks to massive amounts of inconsistency. Despite throwing a one-hitter against the Marlins in early 2005, the Mets made the decision to convert Heilman to a reliever and drop his arm angle to three-quarters rather than overhand. The move seemed to pay off: Heilman finished the year with a sparkling 2.18 ERA and 9.82 K/9 in 46 games for the club, surrendering just 1 home run as a reliever (to Shawn Green).

One of the Mets’ best relievers after 2005, Heilman decided to play winter ball in the Dominican in the offseason with the intention of getting his innings total up and working on his command. When he came back to the team for spring training, he got the impression from the organization that they didn’t really view him as a starter. While the club explored trade options for players like Danys Baez and Julio Lugo – many involving Heilman himself – Heilman dominated in spring training, pitching 17 innings and surrendering just three earned runs. The team stuck him in the bullpen anyways, opting instead to give rotation spots to pitchers the likes of Steve Trachsel and Victor Zambrano. Heilman was vocally upset with not being given the chance to start, but finished the regular season very well. He pitched well in the post-season too, but as fate would have it, he threw the pitch that Yadier Molina – who hit six home runs all season – homered off of to win the NLDS for the Cardinals and send them to the World Series.

Heilman had minor elbow surgery that winter and came to camp determined to start for a team, and the club again half-heartedly shopped him around. Heilman was neither traded nor given much of a shot to contend for a rotation spot, suffering further insult when he wasn’t given an assigned parking spot during Spring Training.

The right-hander quietly had another very good season in 2007 to wrap up a rather remarkable three-year stint as a reliever. From 2005-2007, Heilman pitched 239 innings and posted a 3.01 ERA, a 7.83 K/9, and a 0.53 HR/9. Quite simply, he was excellent. This can be used to argue one of two opposite points:

A) The Mets were stupid not to let him start over some of their other options
B) The Mets were right to put him in the bullpen where his skills were most effective.

Answering that question doesn’t do the team a heck of a lot of good for 2008. Making $1.2 million for the club this year, Heilman has put up some ugly numbers on the season: he currently sits at 2-7, his worst record since he was starting as rookie in 2003. In 63 games, he has a 5.74 ERA and a 1.47 WHIP; hitters are posting a .262/.359/.426 line off him, and he leads all relievers with 9 hit batters.

Heilman has traditionally thrown two pitches: a sinking fastball and a changeup. In 2007, the fastball was clocking in at a very healthy 94.89mph; his mix of fastballs and changeups was 70/30 to right-handed batters and 60/40 to left-handed batters. Once Rick Peterson was fired this past June, Heilman began throwing his slider again (Peterson apparently coached Heilman not to use it during his tenure with the Mets). Heilman’s been mixing the pitch in to right-handed batters this year, and by all accounts, it’s gone alright: righties are hitting just .207 off the reliever. It’s left-handed hitters that have been the problem for Heilman: in 95 at-bats, lefties are slugging .611, and have 7 of the 9 home runs Heilman’s allowed all year to their credit. They’re murdering him.

His 60/40 mix of fastball/changeup to LHBs is largely unchanged from 2007 to 2008. Both his fastball and changeup appear slightly faster this season, but that could very well be noise in the data, as 2008’s information is much more complete than 2007’s. His horizontal movement chart – courtesy Josh Kalk – is a little strange though. Those changeups look awfully sloppy, and in particular, there appears to be a distinct swath of them on the inside part of the plate, perhaps indicating that Heilman’s been missing down and in to lefties. The numbers back up the picture we’re seeing: Heilman has walked 15 lefties in 95 at-bats versus just 14 righties in 150 at-bats. Going back, though, we see that these numbers don’t historically deviate from what Heilman has always done. In fact, it’s his walks to righties that have been the problem: he walked 6 in 2006 and 9 in 2007, and has already walked 14 in 2008. His walk rate against righties has doubled from last year.

Unless you have a lights-out arsenal, walking guys when you’re a reliever is a really bad idea, especially if you’re on a ballclub that’s prone to removing you in the middle of an inning. This introduces the tricky specter of the Strand Rate. The average Strand Rate for major league relievers with at least 40 IP this year is 75.44%. For every 4 batters you allow to reach base, 3 of them will get left out on the basepaths, either by yourself or one of your fellow relievers. Aaron Heilman’s is 66% on the season, and though he’s got the healthiest K/9 he’s ever had (10.07), this is simply not working for him: one out of every 3 runners that reaches on Heilman is coming around to score, a very significant deviation from the 75% average, especially when you’re a reliever and have little wiggle room.

Heilman has been charged with at least one earned run in 20 of his 63 appearances spanning 18.1 innings, with 14 of those being appearances in which he allowed multiple earned runs. He has walked 12 batters – 6 RHB, 6 LHB – in that time and struck out 17. Of the 42 runs he has surrendered, 33 have been of his own accord. I have no context to indicate how commonplace or rare this is, but I think it’s worth noting that of the 10 baserunners he’s left on base for other pitchers, 9 have scored, 7 at the hands of Scot Schoeneweis, who will probably not be getting a Christmas card from the righty this year. It’s also clear that the team is losing confidence in him: In his first 12 run-allowing appearances, he was yanked three times, but in his last 8, he’s been pulled from the game 6 times. Had Heilman’s successor not allowed any of those runs to score his ERA would come down from 5.74 to 4.48, which isn’t great, but is a lot easier to swallow. This would of course actually underscore how bad Heilman has been.

Four of Heilman’s seven losses have come in the last two and a half weeks, an incredible streak of awfulness. Despite the fact that his successors have largely failed him, they can’t be blamed for putting those runners on in the first place. Heilman’s most damning stat is his 1.46 WHIP: he’s allowed 103 baserunners this year and is walking 4.2 batters per 9 innings. A decrease in ground balls – from 45% to 41.5% – also suggests that he’s been leaving too many pitches up in the zone (contributing to his high home run rate). His lack of control could even explain his higher-than-usual strikeout rate via “effectively wild” syndrome. His BABIP is .335 and his HR/FB is 13.8%, and while one could use those to say that he’s been unlucky, they’d be being kind: you can’t expect to succeed when you’re walking and plunking as many batters as Heilman has been.

There have been rumblings in New York that the boo-birds are starting to get to Heilman, who has complained in the past about his treatment but as I mentioned before, had always succeeded out of the ‘pen. Whether for ineffectiveness or health concerns, the team clearly needs to ease up on Heilman. He’s appeared in 63 games this season, tied for the major league lead. The Mets bullpen as a whole has been used 396 times, the most in the division. The Eddie Kunz callup is a step in the right direction, but despite the fact that he had 27 saves at AA Binghamton, his 38/23 K/BB ratio in 45IP suggests that the 2007 first-round draft pick might not be ready just yet. Billy Wagner returns on Monday, and it’s hard to imagine that the club will do anything drastic before then, opting instead to pray for Wagner’s health and hope that his return shifts everyone in the bullpen pack into their rhythm.

After three years of doing what the team wants instead of what he wants, he’s now doing what no one but his opponents want, which is blowing games for the Mets and angering the team’s most ardent supporters. His -1.48 WPA is in Masa Kobayashi territory. His stuff is still good, but he’s never been happy relieving, and now no one is happy that he’s relieving. If the Mets peter out this season and fail to make the playoffs, the bullpen is going to get blamed, and Heilman is going to represent all that the group failed to accomplish. He remains under the Mets’ control through 2010, but if they can find a team who still likes him enough as a starter to part with a mid-range prospect, they should consider moving him. The team has never put its bullpen at the top of its priority list, and when it comes to keeping Heilman, perhaps they’ll finally relent this winter and ship him off.

Quick, name the player that leads the American League in Batting Average (.337), is slugging .548, has 23 stolen bases, and – oh yeah – plays second base.

Give up?

Unless you’ve been paying particularly close attention, or have been frustrated all season by the guy in your league that owns him, you might not be terribly familiar with the Lone Star dynamo that is 26-year old Ian Michael Kinsler. Hailing from The Old Pueblo – sunny Tucson, Arizona – Kinsler was drafted by the Diamondbacks in 2000 (29th round) following an exceptional high school career (and again in 2001 in the 26th), but opted instead to continue with college, which included stops at Arizona State and the University of Mississippi. He was then drafted 496th overall by the Rangers following his 2003 season at Missouri (.335/.416/.536). He was taken as a shortstop after pretty much every team had grabbed one at some point in front of him, but switched to second base in 2005 at AAA Oklahoma (Pacific Coast League). The 6′0″, 200lb Kinsler never looked back, and in 2008 has firmly entrenched himself in the leadoff spot for the league’s premier offensive ballclub after signing a 5-year, $22 million contract this past February that keeps him under the Rangers’ control through 2013.

Going from 17th-round selection to veritable first-half MVP in 5 years is no small feat. He leads the majors in both hits and doubles, has cranked 14 homers, and is on pace to score 144 runs. Nicknamed “lettuce,” apparently because his hair sticking out the sides of his helmet reminds more than a few ballplayers of patches of the leafy plant, Kinsler has in his third full season made his first All-Star team, is the #2 ranked player on Yahoo! Fantasy Baseball, and has begun establishing for himself a reputation as one of the league’s premier young infielders. He hasn’t been doing a ton differently at the plate this year: making a little more contact, trading some ground balls for fly line drives, and the like. He’s a definite pull hitter, and all of his 14 home runs have been to the left field. He’s hitting .356 with runners on base, and .419 with runners in scoring position.

The biggest knock on Kinsler this year has been his flippant ground-ball boxing around the second base bag. His 16 errors and .970 Fielding Percentage are both worst among Major League second basemen, though those figures don’t really tell the full story on Kinsler. He’s also dominating all other Major League 2Bs in assists and putouts, and his 5.71 Range Factor (putouts and assists per 9 innings) is a full .34 ahead of the second place entrant, Placido Polanco. It’s difficult to say how much of this has to do with the Rangers pitching staff (guys like Gabbard and Millwood induce a lot of grounders) and how much of it has to do with Kinsler’s ability to convert balls hit at him to outs. For what it’s worth, Kinsler also lead MLB 2Bs in Range Factor last year (5.69), and Michael Young is third among MLB shortstops at 4.72. It’s also interesting to note that Kinsler’s Zone Rating, as measured by STATS Inc, is not great at .813 (11th among MLB 2B). His Revised Zone Rating, according to THT, is .796, which is decidedly substandard.

Joey Matschulat at MVN recently took a brief look at Kinsler’s defense in 2008, and pointed out that his “range” – or his ability to be mobile and get to difficult grounders – may have taken a step backwards in 2008. According to THT’s Statistics, Kinsler got to 53 balls last year that were out of his zone; as a percentage of his putouts and assists, those out-of-zone grounders made up for 7.4% of his chances. In 2006, they made up 3.125%, and in 2008, they’re making up 3.25%, so yes, he’s taken a step backwards range-wise in 2008. Right? This has not been caused by Kinsler fielding more grounders than usual. His Total Chances per 9 Innings have been very similar for the past 3 years: 5.73, 5.82, 5.88; essentially, he’s only getting one more ground ball every 2 games than he did in 2007. The lack of out-of-zone grounders he’s fielded is very striking, but it might be premature to say that he has in fact taken a step backwards. There is much baseball yet to be played.

There’s one quirky figure in Kinsler’s stats that deserved some exploration. As a percentage of his team’s total chances, (Total Chances/Team Grounders), Kinsler’s rate has increased over the past 2.5 seasons, including a weird spike in 2008. His “Chance Share” from 2006-2008 has gone from 30.16% to 34.22% to 42.37% in 2008. Neither Michael Young nor the Rangers’ 3B carousel has experienced any sort of matching trend. By comparison, Mark Ellis, who is viewed by many as the top defensive 2B in baseball, has participated in 39.30% of his team’s ground balls.

How is it that a player has had as many Chances Per 9 Innings as he’s always had, but he’s got more Chances per Ground Ball than he’s ever had? The answer would seem to have something to do with double play opportunities. Kinsler has had a TON of them this year – 24% more than 2007, to be exact -and he leads baseball in both double plays started and double plays turned (Michael Young is 3rd and 5th, respectively). Robinson Cano was 2007’s DP/9 leader at .882. This year, Kinsler is at 1.04. I’m not aware of any studies on the matter, but it would seem to be clear that double play opportunities are (at least partly) out of a fielder’s control. Sure, they have something to do with the number that they convert, but save for a few really acrobatic twin killings, it’s pretty much a function of runners being on base. This meshes well with the fact that the Rangers pitching staff is absolutely horrible, and there are pretty much always runners on first (they lead the majors with 395 walks allowed).

Again, I don’t know how much influence fielders have over their own ability to participate in double-plays, but if we assume that they don’t, how much is Kinsler’s 5.70 Range Factor influenced by his situation? If we take the average Double Plays per Inning for all qualified second basemen and “normalize” their Double Play numbers, Kinsler’s range factor comes down to 5.36: this still leads the majors, but guys like Polanco (5.27), Utley, and Cano (both 5.20) are closer to him. The double play quirk doesn’t really help us pinpoint the cause of Kinsler’s errors. He attributes them to his “energetic” playing style; others wonder if he’s still playing shortstop in his mind.

Ian Kinsler is not a gold-glove second baseman. However, he’s not exactly Dick Stuart either. He gets a ton of ground balls, and muffs some of them. He also makes a few too many bad throws. From looking at his numbers, one gets the impression that his defensive shortcomings are somewhat exaggerated. Defense remains a difficult skill to evaluate, and Kinsler is no doubt conscious of his high error totals, but I’d be much more comfortable disparaging his defense if this were 2009 and we were still talking about him leading the league in errors.

But it’s not all negatives outside the batter’s box. In addition to Kinsler’s bat-wielding proficiencies, he is also a fantastic base-stealer. Kinsler’s success rate of 95.83% (23/1) is second only to Jimmy Rollins (24/0) and Chase Utley (10/0) in terms of efficiency, and Chase isn’t really in the same league as those two. Using the same method I did to lampoon Hunter Pence’s miserable baserunning, here’s the MLB Baserunning Leaderboard (min: 10 attempts):

RK PLAYER TEAM SB CS ATT SB% OPS BRRV
1 Willy Taveras COL 39 4 43 .907 0.598 4.957
2 Ichiro Suzuki SEA 34 3 37 .919 0.737 4.549
3 Jimmy Rollins PHI 24 0 24 1.000 0.778 4.2
4 Ian Kinsler TEX 23 1 24 .958 0.945 3.558
T-5 Juan Pierre LAD 35 7 42 .833 0.644 2.856
T-5 Jacoby Ellsbury BOS 35 7 42 .833 0.714 2.856

For the first half of 2008, Kinsler hasn’t been a good baserunner, he’s been downright elite. I included the OPS column in this table to give you an idea of how special Kinsler’s blend of speed and power has been thus far. For those curious, there are 5 other guys in the top 30 of the Baserunning Run Value standings with a .900+ OPS: Sizemore (#7, 22 SB), Rodriguez and Holliday (T-#11, 13 SB), Utley (#13, 10 SB), and Berkman (#16, 15 SB). Kinsler is having a special season: since 1901, only 65 players have registered seasons with 40+ steals and a .900+ OPS. The last 5 to do it? Hanley Ramirez (2007, .948/51), Alfonso Soriano (2006, .911/41), Carlos Beltran (2004, .915/42), Bobby Abreu (2004, .972/40), and Beltran again (2003, .911/41). Ty Cobb did it 8 times, Honus Wagner 6 times, and Rickey Henderson did it 4 times. His pace has him set to steal 39; if he has the chance to steal 40, one has to imagine he’ll take it. Kinsler’s Marcels projection has him slipping considerably in the second half: .842 OPS the rest of the way, which would land him at .898 on the season. He’s right on the cusp, and if his first half has been more “manifestation of improved skills” and less “lucky out of his mind,” he’s got a pretty good chances of 40/.900.

Baseball Prospectus’ Joe Sheehan wrote the following of Kinsler after pegging him as a “breakout candidate” this past January:

Kinsler made small improvements across the board in ’07, hitting more fly balls, walking a bit more, stealing more bases at a better rate and playing better defense. Given a full season—Kinsler has missed 74 games in two seasons—he could put up Dan Uggla’s numbers, with much better defense and a higher OBP.

Questions about Kinsler’s defense aside (Sheehan also predicted a monster season from Francoeur, oops), fans who jumped on the Kinsler bandwagon early have been greatly enjoying his (apparent) breakout season. It’ll be next to impossible for him to keep his pace up: his .365 BABIP will come down, and his 45% fly ball rate will have plenty to do with that. Of interest is the fact that while his OPS has climbed each month this year (.754, .881, 1.091, 1.186), his stolen base output may be falling (7, 8, 5, 3 in July). Kinsler pretty much idolizes Michael Young, and has stated on numerous occasions that he uses the shortstop as a model of consistency and focus on and off the field. From 2005-2007, Young has upped his batting average by 16 points in the second half of the season; Kinsler’s supporters are certainly hoping that he’s taking Young’s tutoring to heart.

Ah, the life of a reliever.  Most of the time, your workday starts at about 8:30PM.  Sure, you get a little throwing in during the afternoon here and there, maybe do some working out on the weekends, but usually you’re just relaxing and hanging out on a bench with 6 or 7 other dudes, checking out the cute girls in the crowd and catching the occasional home run.

There’s a flip side to this, of course: save for 50 or 60 guys in the bigs, you are, for all intents and purposes, eminently replaceable.  Everywhere you look, there are candidates to take the job of the guy sitting next to you: flopping starters, young minor leaguers, rule 5 picks.  They’re all candidates to be slotted into the bullpen, and when they are, well, one of you’s gotta go.  Relief pitchers are a little bit like socks.  You’ve got a big drawer full of them, some are left, some are right; they work best when they come in a quality left/right pair, but if you’ve gotta mix and match and make do, hey, they’re just socks, right?  They get the job done even if one’s a little bit bigger than the other one.  They’re also like socks in that your favorite ones tend to get worn over and over and over.  Maybe they’re really cushy, and you get a little irresponsible with your sock rotation.  Before you know it, you slip them on one day, and fwoop: your big toe goes right through the end.  Well, that’s too bad.  Think I’ll go down to the store and get some new ones.

Carlos Marmol has, by most accounts, some of the best “stuff” in the majors as far as relief pitchers go.  With a fastball that sits at about 95mph and bores in on right-handers and a low-80s “slider” that’s got about 7 inches of movement on it, he’s got the pitches to strike out any batter on any given night.  Lately, though, he’s been struggling, amassing a 9.34 ERA since June 1st.  What gives?

Marmol has appeared in 49 games this year, throwing 52.1 innings over the stretch.  Put simply, that’s just too much throwing.  He’s projected to appear in 84 games this year and throw 90 innings.  Last season, only two pitchers appeared in 84+ games: Jon Rauch (88) and Saul Rivera (85), while only three guys threw 90 or more innings: Heath Bell (93.2), Saul Rivera (93), and Peter Moylan (90).  Rauch also appeared in 85 games in 2006, and at a towering 6′11″ 291lbs, could probably throw 200 innings per year even if he was forced to pitch with a bowling ball.  Saul Rivera, the only man to qualify for both lists in 2007, is just as much of a physical freak of nature as Rauch: he’s listed at 5′11″ 150lbs, and is a 70/30 fastball/slider pitcher who’s also getting a bunch of work this year.  Heath Bell’s currently healthy and pitching in San Diego, while Peter Moylan is shelved for the season after undergoing surgery on his right elbow earlier this year.

Marmol, at 6′2″ 180, is rather slight of build for an athlete.  I’m obviously not trying to make a causal connection between size and durability, but there’s reason to believe that Marmol isn’t really cut out to be an 80-game pitcher.  Marmol was signed out of the Dominican as a outfield/catcher prospect, but when scouts judged that his bat wasn’t MLB-caliber, they put him on the mound, and he dazzled while alternating between starter and reliever.  Most of the dazzling was happening in the first few innings, though, and he tended to be too wild to last late into ballgames. He started 13 games in 2006, but hurt his arm in August and was made into a full-time reliever following his return.  He shined in 2007, striking out 96 batters in 69.1 innings (1.43 ERA). Going into 2008, Marmol was the club’s top setup option in front of Kerry Wood.  Manager Lou Piniella has shown that he has no qualms about pitching Marmol on an almost nightly basis, opting instead to take it easier on Kerry Wood, who’s thrown 44.2 innings this season (and 233 fewer pitches).

Depending on who you ask, the slider is either the most or second-most stressful pitch a person can throw.  Marmol, of course, throws a ton of them.  He’s thrown 920 pitches this year, of which between 40-45% have been sliders, depending on the classification algorithm you use (most of his other pitches are fastballs in the low-to-mid 90s).  Mike Wuertz, Brad Lidge, and Doug Waechter are the only pitchers who throw more sliders as a percentage of their pitches than Marmol, and Doug Waechter is the closest to Marmol in terms of pitch count with just 747.  Marmol has thrown 70 or 80 more sliders than anyone else in baseball, and they appear to be taking a toll.  Here’s a look at Marmol’s daily K/BB and BB/9 graphs for 2008:

Not so good.  After peaking with a K/BB of almost 7 in late April, Marmol is down to a pedestrian 2.8 as the summer months have witnessed his BB/9 climb to 4.3.  Neither number is great, though both are right around where he finished 2007 (2.754, 4.54).  After appearing to be solidifying his reputation as a top right-handed setup man, Marmol has come back down to earth rather dramatically over the past month or so.

So is Marmol wearing down, hurt, or was he just pitching way over his head in the first couple months of the season?  Given that his current season numbers are closely aligned with his numbers from last season, I’m tempted to say it’s a little bit of the first and a lot of the latter.  Marmol hasn’t really done much in the majors to this point, so there’s nothing to say he’s going to establish himself as a full-season, dominant force, especially if his pitch load remains the same.  Piniella is almost certainly overworking him right now, and his numbers appear to be suffering as a result.  He could benefit from a reduced workload in the coming months, so that he’s able to stay fresh and maintain his peak velocity and movement as the Cubs head into the playoffs (which they almost certainly will do).  Against a patient ballclub, a BB/9 that approaches 5 will spell trouble for a pitcher whose fastball stays up in the zone and induces a lot of fly balls (56%).  If his fastball isn’t at “exceptional” level, that could mean big trouble and broken hearts in Wrigley Field come October.

Hunter Pence has never really looked like a real major league baseball player to me.  Listed at 6′4″ 220lbs, the blond-haired Texan seems too gangly a mess of arms and legs to ever amount to much on the field, the kind of player that wears his uniform a little too snugly and and habitually sticks his tongue out when he exerts himself.  If you thought he didn’t belong on the ballfield, though, you’d probably be wrong: since being taken by the Houston Astros in the second round of the 2004 draft, Pence has impressed at every stop, going .303/376/.554 from over four minor league seasons before making serious Rookie of the Year noise in his 2007 freshman campaign.

Scouts have tended to disagree on Pence’s ceiling throughout his entire playing career.  The kind of player that does “nothing pretty but everything well,” he projected to some as an average major leaguer and others as a five-tool star.  He made a habit of choking up on the bat during his minor league career, a tendency which stuck out considering Pence’s size and reputation for power (Pence has remarked that even his mother made fun of him for doing so).  He tended to be extremely streaky at the plate.  He had good speed, but had a strange, loping, arm-intensive stride that lacked fluidity.  He had a strong throwing arm, but did a funky stutter-hop before unleashing the ball in a violent, jerky motion.  He wore only one batting glove, on his left hand.  He was quick, but seemed too “long” to be a gold-glove caliber outfielder.  He has a hitch in his swing where he brings his hands way down before coming through the zone, a point that major league pitchers could exploit by busting him in.

Still, Pence impressed everyone in the Astros organization, and batted .571/.647/1.071 in spring training prior to the 2007 season.  Despite his efforts, he was sent down in favor of 27 year old Chris Burke, a nifty little multi-position player who was in his fourth season with the organization and was rumored have both speed and the ability to hit for average.  Neither proved to be true, and the Astros quickly realized the error of their ways: on April 28th of that year, the club announced their plans to call Pence up to the majors and hand him the starting center fielder gig.  He responded by going out of his mind at the plate, hitting .342 through the All-Star Break and finishing the year batting .322 with 9 triples, 17 homers, 11 steals, and 69 RBI despite missing a month with a chip fracture in his right wrist.  Pence’s Astros finished 73-89.

Prior to the 2008 season, the young outfielder earned himself a little bit of unwanted media attention when, on the eve of the club’s first full-squad workout, he accidentally leaped through a sliding glass door on his way to the bathroom, which shattered and left him covered with small lacerations on his hands, knees, and pretty much everywhere else (he was wearing a bathing suit at the time). He received numerous stitches and missed about a week of action, but returned at full-strength on March 3rd and went on to have an excellent spring (.352, 3HR).

Pence started the 2008 regular season in the #2 spot in the order because Kaz Matsui, who was the Astros’ planned #2 hitter, was out of commission with – ugh – a “severe anal fissure.” Pence struggled to a .161 average in the first two weeks of the season and found himself dropped to #7 slot, but got to .250 by the end of April thanks to a 14-for-29 stretch towards the end of the month. Pence went .346/.400/.577 in May but slumped again in June and is currently sporting a mediocre .265/.306/.422 line in 332 at-bats.  As his hitting has gone through peaks and valleys (he was at .311 on May 27th then hit just .200 in June), so has his spot in the order: he’s got at least 50 at bats in the 1, 2, 6, and 7 spots in the order, with most of his time coming at #6 where he’s hitting .297.

Something of a free-swinger, Pence doesn’t care much for walks.  His 5.7% walk rate is on the very low end of the spectrum, alongside fellow contact guys like Pudge Rodriguez, Juan Pierre, and Dustin Pedroia.  For a “dynamic” guy, though, he strikes out a little too often right now, with just 0.29 walks for every K (13th worst in the majors).  It’s not impossible to thrive with a BB/K figure that low – Ryan Braun and Corey Hart’s are lower, though they both have shown more power than Pence and have better contact rates.  Still, his

plate discipline is less than stellar.  30.87% of the balls that Pence swings at are outside of the strike zone; of players with O-Swing figures that high, Pence’s contact rate on balls outside the strike zone – 52.13% – is 3rd worst, behind Torii Hunter, Matt Kemp, and Mike Jacobs.  The book on Pence generally says that he has a predilection towards sliders down and away, a la Alfonso Soriano.  The numbers would seem to give a general thumbs up to that assertion.  All of these rate statistics have carried over from 2007.  His batting average on balls in play last year was .378, though; this year, it’s come down to earth, as has his batting average.  Pence probably won’t finish his career with a .300 batting average.

Pence has also been bad enough on the basepaths this year to warrant a reconsideration of his supposed base-stealing abilities. According to The Book (2007: Tango, Lichtman, Dolphin), a baserunner being caught stealing has a “Runs to End of Inning” value of -0.467 (the average team will score almost a half-run less per inning when a runner is caught stealing), and is the single most detrimental offensive play a baseball player can make. In 2008, Hunter Pence has stolen 5 bases on the season and has been caught 7 times, a .417 success percentage that is far and away the worst among major league regulars who have attempted at least 10 steals. Pence was “only” 31 for 45 in his minor league career (.689), and no major leaguer who stole 20 bases last year had a SB% less than .700 (as a group, 20-steal players in 2007 were .824). Using Run Values and Win Values from The Book, I calculated “Baserunning Run Values” and “Baserunning Win Values” for Major League starters in 2008 based on SB and CS. Here, according to those values, are the 5 most overrated baserunners in the majors (min. 10 SB attempts):

Rk Player TM SB CS BRRV BRWV
1 Pence, Hunter HOU 5 7 -2.394 -0.211
2 DeJesus, David KCR 6 5 -1.285 -0.107
3 Theriot, Ryan CHC 15 8 -1.111 -0.074
4 Granderson, Curtis DET 6 4 -0.818 -0.064
5 Damon, Johnny NYY 13 6 -0.527 -0.024

In short, he’s been killing his team on the basepaths (I’m considering them “overrated” because they get lots of attempts – you can’t call them “the worst” because the truly awful guys just never even try). He’s not getting picked off, either, catchers have simply been throwing him out. In 2008, MLB catchers have averaged a .263 Caught Stealing Percentage; Pence has been thrown out by Chris Coste (.270 in 40 games) Mike Rabelo (.273 in 32 games), Josh Bard (.128 in 37 games), Paul Bako (.318 in 60 games), Raul Chavez (.412 in 19 games), Dioner Navarro (.381in 61 games), and Corky Miller (.500 in 19 games). Navarro is the only catcher on that list who is his team’s primary catcher, and Josh Bard is widely considered to be one of the worst catchers in the majors at throwing out baserunners, so being caught by him is not only detrimental to your team’s success but is in fact borderline insulting. Pence has never stolen 20 bases in his professional career, and it’s almost a guarantee that he won’t accomplish the feat at the major league level. He might never steal 15.  One weird note is that he currently leads major league baseball with 23 infield hits, one ahead of Ichiro Suzuki.  None of these have been bunt hits, so it may stand to reason that he’s been topping off balls and is very good at getting out of the box.  More likely, though, is the theory that Pence has been relatively lucky in this department, and that his batting average should be even lower: he had just 13 last year in over 100 more plate appearances, and only five players had more than 23 infield hits on the season last year (Ichiro was the leader, with 44).  There are usually only 3 or 4 guys per season that have 30+ infield hits, so Pence’s rate is likely not sustainable.

While he may not be a good base stealer, Pence is athletic enough to be a good defensive outfielder. He split time between CF and RF in 2008, but when the club brought Michael Bourn into man center in 2008, Pence was switched permanently to right, a move which seems to have paid off defensively for the Astros. The Astros are tied for the fifth-best fielding percentage in baseball, and after posting an .885 Revized Zone Rating in CF in 2007, Pence has put up a .931 RZR in RF in 2008 and is second among NL right fielders in out-of-zone outs recorded (he’s also got 6 assists and has yet to make an error in 746 innings).  He’s got the pop to play corner outfield, though his 10.3% HR/FB rate could use a little boost.

What Astros fans have in their 25-year old right fielder is a guy who will hit .280 with 25 homers and 10 steals on a regular basis, and should drive in 80-100 runs with the right guys around him.  He’s probably never going to be a legitimate MVP candidate, but should find his way onto a few All-Star squads due to his propensity to run hot and cold (he’ll have years where a big first half makes him a shoe-in).  He’s a youthful talent in an organization that’s still looking for a post-Bagwell/Biggio identity, and his presence and playing style should endear him to a new generation of Astros fans.  At 41-48, the Astros aren’t going to make the playoffs this year, despite strong seasons from Lance Berkman, Carlos Lee, and Miguel Tejada.  Their rotation, of which Runelvys Hernandez actually counts himself a member, is a complete joke, and they lack the prospects to make 2009 – or even 2010 – seem like sure things.  With that knowledge, it’s going to be very important for the organization that Pence play like the exciting player that everyone seems to think he has the potential to be.  Smarten up on the basepaths, son.

Here’s a quick look at how Jon Lester vs. Alex Rodriguez (0-4, K) went down during his complete game shutout of the Yankees on Thursday, July 3rd:

The left-hander threw 13 pitches to Rodriguez over the course of 4 at-bats. The blue box is A-Rod’s approximate strike zone, and the arrow represents the batter (the axis are in feet). 9 of the 13 pitches were classified by PitchFX as fastballs, and they have been circled in blue.

The only pattern that seems clear here is that Lester was avoiding putting the ball down and away from A-Rod. Other than that, he was mixing his spots, which is probably as good an idea as any against an elite batter like Rodriguez. The first at-bat, which lasted five pitches, was the most interesting. He took the first two pitches, both fastballs right at the knee, and fell behind 0-2 (the only two called strikes against A-Rod in the game). Lester then tried to climb the ladder with the high fastball you see there. Rodriguez then fouled off a nasty cutter on the inside corner of the strike zone before whiffing on a fastball directly on the upper-right cordner of the strike zone. Varitek set the at-bat up beautifully, Lester executed, and Rodriguez went down swinging.

A-Rod, possibly anticipating fastball, swung at the first pitch of his second at-bat. He got a change-up on the right side of the plate – again, excellent execution by Lester – and pulled it on the ground to Lugo. He went up swinging in his third at-bat, and this time got a first pitch right on the inside corner, a fastball right on his hands that he fouled off. He went up and away with a curveball that just barely missed being called a strike. He went back inside for the third pitch, placing it almost exactly where the first fastball was. This pitch was a cut fastball, though, coming in at about 3mph slower than the first. Rodriguez managed to lay off of it. He fouled off another fastball in on the hands, took another fastball in at the knees that could’ve gone either way, and then flied out to Coco Crisp on a fastball back on the outside corner.

In A-Rod’s final at-bat, he appeared to guess right on the first pitch, a fastball right on the inner edge of the plate that Rodriguez finally managed to get his hands inside of and put in play. He didn’t get all of it, though, and the result was a routine fly ball to Ellsbury in left to end the game.

The Lester/Rodriguez matchup was a great example of what happens when a pitcher is really “on” during a performance: hitters get set up, the pitcher executes, and batters are retired. For most of the game, Rodriguez was unable to handle pitches on the inner half of the plate and couldn’t do anything with pitches on the outer half, and when he finally got around on an inside fastball, the pitch was good enough to result in a harmless fly out. A-Rod is arguably the best hitter alive and one of the best of all time, but no matter how good you are with the bat, when you run into a pitcher that’s having an exceptional night, you’re probably not going to do very well. #13 has certainly already reviewed what Lester and the Sox did against him that night (he got two hits yesterday against the Sox). Yankees and Red Sox fans alike eagerly await how the next Lester-Rodriguez matchups turn out.

After throwing five innings of two-hit baseball last night at Minute Maid Park in Houston, Texas, Red Sox starter Daisuke Matsuzaka moved to 9-1 on the season, an impressive mark which completely belies the fact that he’s been pitching like a blind person for the majority of 2008.   His arsenal is as wide-ranging and varied as the results it yields – as we pass the midway point of the season, Matsuzaka’s four-seamers, two-seamers, cutters, and splitters have been dividing their time between generating strikeouts and landing two feet outside the strike zone, vexing hitters and Yankees fans alike as he continues to rack up wins.

The numbers aren’t pretty.  In 70 innings, Matsuzaka has walked 40 and struck out 60, a nifty 7.71 K/9 counteracted by a disgusting 5.66 BB/9, third-worst among starters with at least 60 IP (the two starters worse than him, Miguel Batista and Tom Gorzelanny, are a combined 9-16).  Daisuke’s simply been all over the place this year, and for each of his cleaner efforts – like his 6.2IP, 9/0 K/BB start against the Athletics on April 1st -he’s thrown incredible clunkers, like his start against the Tigers on May 5th in which he threw five innings, struck out one, walked EIGHT batters, and still recorded the win.  In 13 starts this year, he’s walked 4+ batters five times, and 3+ batters eight times.

While the Sox have been scoring a healthy 6.04 Runs per 9 innings for him, Matsuzaka’s benefitted from a lot of luck to go along with his strikeout numbers.  Batted balls are dropping in for hits at a rate of just .259, which is the key contributing factor to his .212 batting average against.  The .212 figure is 8th in the bigs (min: 60IP), but four of the pitchers ahead of him strike out more batters than Daisuke (Marcum, Volquez, Harden, Kazmir), and none even come close to his 1.39 WHIP.  His strand rate of 77.2% is lucky enough, but when you consider that alongside his BB/9 figure, it is probably the luckiest in the league.  There are five other pitchers who have BB/9 figures over 5.00, and their strand rates are all way lower: Batista (64.9%), Gorzelanny (68.0%), Perez (71.4%), Zito (64.6%), and Snell (67.4%).

Matsuzaka’s Fielding-Independent Pitching ERA of 4.17 is currently being depressed by a ridiculously low home run rate.  46.7% of balls hit in play against him have been fly balls, but only 5 of those 93 flies have been homers, a 5.4% HR/FB.  For comparison, 16.1% have been infield flies.  Two of the five homers came in his first two starts (Mark Ellis and Jack Cust), and one was a Aaron Miles weak pull-job to right field in Fenway that had a 23mph wind behind it.  None have had true distances of over 400 feet; for whatever reason, no one has really squared up on Matsuzaka this year.  This is all the more interesting when considering that 7/13 starts have been made at Fenway, a park which generally turns its fair share of fly balls into homers.

For all his wildness, Matsuzaka has only had one truly awful start this year, and that was in his first appearance after a DL stint: facing the Cardinals on June 21st, he surrendered 7 runs on 6 hits and 3 walks in 1+ innings.  Aside from that, the reasons for his wildness and his ability to get himself out of jams have both been equally difficult to grasp.  His K/BB ratios are identical with the bases empty and with baserunners on, so he doesn’t appear to be having any problems with the stretch.  Perhaps batters are simply waiting around too much: when going after the first pitch, hitters are 13-36 (.361) with 2 homers and 6 doubles in 2008.

Next Page »